0.00/0.08	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.08	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.07/0.27	% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
0.07/0.27	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.07/0.27	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.07/0.27	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.07/0.27	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.07/0.27	% CPULimit   : 960
0.07/0.27	% WCLimit    : 120
0.07/0.27	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 05:58:45 EDT 2022
0.07/0.27	% CPUTime    : 
0.12/0.39	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.12/0.39	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.12/0.40	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.12/0.40	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSLMNSFA.
0.12/0.40	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.12/0.40	# Starting new_ho_10 with 600s (5) cores
0.12/0.40	# Starting full_lambda_3 with 120s (1) cores
0.12/0.40	# Starting ho_unfolding_6 with 120s (1) cores
0.12/0.40	# Starting sh4l with 120s (1) cores
0.12/0.40	# full_lambda_3 with pid 20266 completed with status 0
0.12/0.40	# Result found by full_lambda_3
0.12/0.40	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSLMNSFA.
0.12/0.40	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.12/0.40	# Starting new_ho_10 with 600s (5) cores
0.12/0.40	# Starting full_lambda_3 with 120s (1) cores
0.12/0.40	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,1.5,,2,20000,1.0)
0.12/0.40	# ...ProofStateSinE()=4/10
0.12/0.40	# Search class: HHUSF-FFSF22-DSFFMSBN
0.12/0.40	# partial match(1): HHUSF-FFSF22-SSFFMSBN
0.12/0.40	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.12/0.40	# Starting new_ho_10 with 65s (1) cores
0.12/0.40	# new_ho_10 with pid 20270 completed with status 0
0.12/0.40	# Result found by new_ho_10
0.12/0.40	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSLSSSLMNSFA.
0.12/0.40	# Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.12/0.40	# Starting new_ho_10 with 600s (5) cores
0.12/0.40	# Starting full_lambda_3 with 120s (1) cores
0.12/0.40	# SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,1.5,,2,20000,1.0)
0.12/0.40	# ...ProofStateSinE()=4/10
0.12/0.40	# Search class: HHUSF-FFSF22-DSFFMSBN
0.12/0.40	# partial match(1): HHUSF-FFSF22-SSFFMSBN
0.12/0.40	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.12/0.40	# Starting new_ho_10 with 65s (1) cores
0.12/0.40	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.12/0.40	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.12/0.40	
0.12/0.40	# Proof found!
0.12/0.40	# SZS status Theorem
0.12/0.40	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.12/0.40	thf(decl_22, type, in: $i > $i > $o).
0.12/0.40	thf(decl_23, type, dsetconstr: $i > ($i > $o) > $i).
0.12/0.40	thf(decl_24, type, dsetconstrI: $o).
0.12/0.40	thf(decl_25, type, binunion: $i > $i > $i).
0.12/0.40	thf(decl_26, type, binunionIR: $o).
0.12/0.40	thf(decl_27, type, symdiff: $i > $i > $i).
0.12/0.40	thf(decl_28, type, esk1_0: $i).
0.12/0.40	thf(decl_29, type, esk2_0: $i).
0.12/0.40	thf(decl_30, type, esk3_0: $i).
0.12/0.40	thf(dsetconstrI, axiom, ((dsetconstrI)<=>![X1:$i, X2:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(((in @ X3 @ X1)=>((X2 @ X3)=>(in @ X3 @ (dsetconstr @ X1 @ (^[X4:$i]:((X2 @ X4))))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', dsetconstrI)).
0.12/0.40	thf(symdiffI2, conjecture, (((binunionIR)=>![X1:$i, X5:$i, X3:$i]:((((in @ X3 @ X5)=>(in @ X3 @ (symdiff @ X1 @ X5)))<=~((in @ X3 @ X1)))))<=(dsetconstrI)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', symdiffI2)).
0.12/0.40	thf(binunionIR, axiom, ((binunionIR)<=>![X1:$i, X5:$i, X3:$i]:(((in @ X3 @ X5)=>(in @ X3 @ (binunion @ X1 @ X5))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', binunionIR)).
0.12/0.40	thf(symdiff, axiom, ((symdiff)=(^[X1:$i, X5:$i]:(dsetconstr @ (binunion @ X1 @ X5) @ (^[X3:$i]:((~((in @ X3 @ X1))|~((in @ X3 @ X5)))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', symdiff)).
0.12/0.40	thf(c_0_4, plain, ((dsetconstrI)<=>![X1:$i, X2:$i > $o, X3:$i]:(((in @ X3 @ X1)=>((X2 @ X3)=>(in @ X3 @ (dsetconstr @ X1 @ (^[Z0:$i]:((X2 @ Z0))))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[dsetconstrI])).
0.12/0.40	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ~((![X18:$i, X19:$i > $o, X20:$i]:(((in @ X20 @ X18)=>((X19 @ X20)=>(in @ X20 @ (dsetconstr @ X18 @ (^[Z0:$i]:((X19 @ Z0))))))))=>(![X15:$i, X16:$i, X17:$i]:(((in @ X17 @ X16)=>(in @ X17 @ (binunion @ X15 @ X16))))=>![X1:$i, X5:$i, X3:$i]:((~(in @ X3 @ X1)=>((in @ X3 @ X5)=>(in @ X3 @ (symdiff @ X1 @ X5)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(apply_def,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[symdiffI2]), c_0_4]), binunionIR])])).
0.12/0.40	thf(c_0_6, plain, ((symdiff)=(^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i]:(dsetconstr @ (binunion @ Z0 @ Z1) @ (^[Z2:$i]:((~((in @ Z2 @ Z0))|~((in @ Z2 @ Z1)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[symdiff])).
0.12/0.40	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X21:$i, X22:$i > $o, X23:$i, X24:$i, X25:$i, X26:$i]:(((~(in @ X23 @ X21)|(~(X22 @ X23)|(in @ X23 @ (dsetconstr @ X21 @ (^[Z0:$i]:((X22 @ Z0)))))))&((~(in @ X26 @ X25)|(in @ X26 @ (binunion @ X24 @ X25)))&(~(in @ esk3_0 @ esk1_0)&((in @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0)&~(in @ esk3_0 @ (symdiff @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0))))))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])).
0.12/0.40	thf(c_0_8, plain, ((symdiff)=(^[Z0:$i, Z1:$i]:(dsetconstr @ (binunion @ Z0 @ Z1) @ (^[Z2:$i]:((~((in @ Z2 @ Z0))|~((in @ Z2 @ Z1)))))))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.12/0.40	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X3:$i, X2:$i > $o, X1:$i]:(((in @ X1 @ (dsetconstr @ X3 @ X2))|~((in @ X1 @ X3))|~((X2 @ X1)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.12/0.40	thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X1:$i, X3:$i]:(((dsetconstr @ (binunion @ X1 @ X3) @ (^[Z0:$i]:((~((in @ Z0 @ X1))|~((in @ Z0 @ X3))))))=(symdiff @ X1 @ X3))), inference(arg_cong,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.12/0.40	thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X3:$i, X4:$i]:(((in @ X1 @ (symdiff @ X3 @ X4))|~((~((in @ X1 @ X3))|~((in @ X1 @ X4))))|~((in @ X1 @ (binunion @ X3 @ X4))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])).
0.12/0.40	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X3:$i, X4:$i]:(((in @ X1 @ (symdiff @ X3 @ X4))|(in @ X1 @ X3)|~((in @ X1 @ (binunion @ X3 @ X4))))), inference(dynamic cnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
0.12/0.40	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X4:$i, X3:$i]:(((in @ X1 @ (binunion @ X4 @ X3))|~((in @ X1 @ X3)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.12/0.40	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, ~((in @ esk3_0 @ (symdiff @ esk1_0 @ esk2_0))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.12/0.40	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X1:$i, X3:$i, X4:$i]:(((in @ X1 @ (symdiff @ X3 @ X4))|(in @ X1 @ X3)|~((in @ X1 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13])).
0.12/0.40	thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, (in @ esk3_0 @ esk2_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.12/0.40	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ~((in @ esk3_0 @ esk1_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
0.12/0.40	thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15]), c_0_16])]), c_0_17]), ['proof']).
0.12/0.40	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.12/0.40	# Parsed axioms                        : 10
0.12/0.40	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 6
0.12/0.40	# Initial clauses                      : 6
0.12/0.40	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
0.12/0.40	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 6
0.12/0.40	# Processed clauses                    : 18
0.12/0.40	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.12/0.40	# ...subsumed                          : 0
0.12/0.40	# ...remaining for further processing  : 18
0.12/0.40	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.12/0.40	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.12/0.40	# Backward-subsumed                    : 0
0.12/0.40	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.12/0.40	# Generated clauses                    : 9
0.12/0.40	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 6
0.12/0.40	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.12/0.40	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
0.12/0.40	# Paramodulations                      : 4
0.12/0.40	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.12/0.40	# NegExts                              : 0
0.12/0.40	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.12/0.40	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.12/0.40	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.12/0.40	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.12/0.40	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.12/0.40	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.12/0.40	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.12/0.40	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.12/0.40	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.12/0.40	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.12/0.40	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.12/0.40	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.12/0.40	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.12/0.40	# Current number of processed clauses  : 11
0.12/0.40	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 4
0.12/0.40	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.12/0.40	#    Negative unit clauses             : 2
0.12/0.40	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 5
0.12/0.40	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
0.12/0.40	# ...number of literals in the above   : 0
0.12/0.40	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.12/0.40	# Current number of archived clauses   : 7
0.12/0.40	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 9
0.12/0.40	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
0.12/0.40	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
0.12/0.40	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
0.12/0.40	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.12/0.40	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
0.12/0.40	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.12/0.40	# Condensation attempts                : 18
0.12/0.40	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.12/0.40	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 1049
0.12/0.40	
0.12/0.40	# -------------------------------------------------
0.12/0.40	# User time                : 0.002 s
0.12/0.40	# System time              : 0.004 s
0.12/0.40	# Total time               : 0.007 s
0.12/0.40	# Maximum resident set size: 1756 pages
0.12/0.40	
0.12/0.40	# -------------------------------------------------
0.12/0.40	# User time                : 0.004 s
0.12/0.40	# System time              : 0.006 s
0.12/0.40	# Total time               : 0.010 s
0.12/0.40	# Maximum resident set size: 1716 pages
0.12/0.40	EOF